O'Malley seeks review of closings

Acknowledges laity's unrest on parishes

Archbishop Sean P. O'Malley, in an acknowledgment of the widespread unhappiness that has greeted his effort to close 82 of the 357 parishes in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston, announced yesterday that he has asked eight prominent Catholics to review the closing process.

O'Malley did not suspend the church closings. In fact, an East Boston parish, Our Lady of Mount Carmel, is slated to close Sunday, and an Arlington parish, St. James the Apostle, is scheduled to close Oct. 17.

The committee's leaders yesterday offered a general description of their mandate, but said that they expected to begin making recommendations quickly and that they expect their advice will lead to changes in the timing or other specifics of some closing decisions. They said they could not say whether their work might prevent the closing of individual parishes, but strongly suggested they could recommend that O'Malley rethink some planned closings.

''I would be surprised if the archbishop didn't reconsider some," said Peter Meade, chairman of the board of Catholic Charities in Boston, who is executive vice president of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts.

The committee is to be led by Meade and by Sister Janet Eisner, president of Emmanuel College, a Catholic liberal arts college in Boston. Both head prominent Catholic institutions, but neither reports to O'Malley.

In a joint interview yesterday, they stressed that they are independent of O'Malley and are prepared to tell him that he has made mistakes if they conclude that he has done so.

''He doesn't expect us to say he did a really great job," Eisner said.

Meade added, ''I don't think anybody thinks this group is going to be a hosanna chorus."

No timetable has been established for the panel's review. Meade and Eisner said they do not expect to revisit closing decisions that have been implemented, a posture that is expected to draw criticism from some Catholics whose parishes have closed. Meade and Eisner said they do not expect to intervene in talks between the archdiocese and protesters in Weymouth and Sudbury, who have occupied their closed parishes as they seek to persuade the archdiocese to undo the closings.

The two added that they chose the other committee members and that O'Malley neither rejected nor added anyone. The panel members include Jack Connors Jr., a major Catholic philanthropist who has become an outspoken critic of archdiocesan management and who serves as chairman of a Catholic university, Boston College, and the advertising firm, Hill, Holiday, Connors, Cosmopulos.

The other members are Neal Finnegan, chairman of Citizens Bank of Massachusetts and a former chairman of Catholic Charities; Marylou Batt, vice president of Lesley University; and Donna Latson Gittens, chief executive of the advertising firm Causemedia. The committee includes two archdiocesan employees -- Monsignor Dennis Sheehan, pastor of St. Paul Church in Cambridge, and Jeanne Lafond, the pastoral associate at St. Patrick Church in Brockton.

At least one member of the committee, Latson Gittens, belongs to a parish that is scheduled to close. Latson Gittens worships at St. John-St. Hugh in Roxbury, which is scheduled to be closed in a de facto merger with another closing Roxbury parish, St. Francis de Sales-St. Philip.

O'Malley declined to be interviewed yesterday, but said in a written statement: ''I have known from the beginning that the consolidation of parishes would be painful to the people directly affected. I believe at this point in the process that I can benefit from an external review of the reconfiguration begun last January. I hope that an assessment of the past by this committee will lead them to make suggestions that will help us to improve the process."

Critics of the closings were taken aback by yesterday's development and questioned how much influence the panel will have over a process that is well underway and is scheduled to be largely completed by the end of the year.

''The problem is the current schedule is so accelerated, with all the closings to be completed 2 months from now, that this is putting an awful lot of pressure on the committee," said Secretary of State William F. Galvin, whose own parish, Our Lady of the Presentation in Brighton, closed Aug. 30. ''Clearly, there is discontent, and that's obvious to everybody, including the archbishop. But you'd have thought you'd review it earlier than this. I'm more puzzled than anything else."

The process to close parishes began last December, when O'Malley, then five months into his tenure as archbishop, launched what he calls a ''parish reconfiguration," saying that a shortage of priests, worshipers, and dollars necessitate the closing of a large number of parishes. He announced in May a list of parishes to be closed and closed the first, Sacred Heart in Medford, on July 25.

Thus far, the archdiocese has closed 28 parishes, largely without incident. Parishioners at St. Alphonsus in Beverly responded to the closure of their parish by raising money to create a chapel named San Alfonso in the Dominican Republic. In East Boston, two pastors and a seminarian brokered an agreement to save a building associated with Our Lady of Mount Carmel, an agreement that caused that parish's parishioners to abandon plans to stage a sit-in at their church.

But two closed parishes, St. Albert the Great in Weymouth and St. Anselm in Sudbury, are now occupied by Catholics who oppose the closings, and two parishes, St. Albert the Great and Sacred Heart in Boston's North End, have filed civil suits in an effort to block the archdiocese from seizing parish assets.

A spokesman for the St. Albert's parishioners said the vigil at St. Albert's will continue ''until our parish is reestablished." The spokesman, Colin Riley, expressed disappointment that the new committee does not plan to reconsider the status of parishes that have already closed.

''We understand from news reports that the review won't include parishes that have closed," he said. ''For someone who's supposed to be so sensitive to people's needs, I can't imagine that Archbishop O'Malley can't see the cruelty inherent in establishing a committee to review the reconfigeration process, which explicitly excludes those parishes which have been harmed and have suffered so much. It's another form of abuse."

Many closing parishes have filed canonical appeals to O'Malley, who has thus far declined to overturn any decisions to close, and some parishes have appealed to the Vatican. Numerous lay Catholics have complained that O'Malley and his aides have been uncommunicative and unresponsive to laypeople and priests who have sought to express disagreement with the decisions.

Meade and Eisner said that because they have not yet met with the full committee, they did not know exactly how the panel would conduct its review, how often it would meet, whether it would issue written recommendations, how laypeople and clergy might interact with the committee, and whether any recommendations would be public.

But they said they expected to meet with the other members of the committee soon, to act quickly, and to communicate with O'Malley regularly. And they said the expect to have an immediate impact.

Both said O'Malley is right to close parishes, even if the specifics are debated.

''The archbishop would be irresponsible in the extreme if he weren't looking at how we resize the diocese. There is no rational way we can continue with the number of parishes we have," Meade said.

Michael Paulson can be reached at mpaulson@globe.com. Bella English of the Globe staff contributed to this report.